Archive for November, 2009

The Horrors of the LaLaurie Mansion

Posted by Jessica Jewett 2 Comments »

This impressive building on the left used to be owned by actor Nicholas Cage before he went broke and lost it among several other properties he owned. I saw that the mansion was going up on the auction block and I was honestly quite stunned that Nicholas Cage owned a building with such a gruesome history. This building was the site of alleged horrific mutilations, murder and things so terrifying that even Stephen King couldn’t write it on his best day. I actually want to shake the hand of the realtor who even managed to get Nicholas Cage to look at the building let alone get him to buy it, given the history of violence around it.

The LaLaurie mansion was owned by Dr. Louis LaLaurie and his wife, Delphine LaLaurie. She was born in about 1775 and she was twice widowed by the time she married Louis in 1825. Before she married him, she was married to a slave trader, and as a girl, her parents were allegedly killed in a slave uprising, which undoubtedly left her a disturbed creature. The LaLauries bought the mansion on Royale Street in New Orleans together in 1831. The couple was among the creme of New Orleans society and Madame LaLaurie, as she was known, regularly entertained guests with lavish parties in her opulent home. Little did New Orleans society know, Madame LaLaurie was torturing her slaves in the most vile and wicked ways.

Rumors began amongst the LaLaurie’s neighbors about possible mistreatment of slaves in 1833 after an incident with a 12-year-old slave girl. She was brushing Madame LaLaurie’s hair and caught a snag. It enraged the Madame and the slave girl was viciously whipped. As she tried to escape, she fell from the balcony and was killed. The body was brought into the house immediately as to not arouse gossip among the neighbors but it was too late — they had seen everything and saw the slave girl being buried under a tree in the yard. They reported it to the authorities and a judge, also a friend of the LaLauries, was sent to examine the welfare of the slaves. He ruled that all of the LaLaurie slaves be removed from the home and sold at auction but the LaLaurie relatives bought the slaves back and returned them to the mansion.

The next year, during yet another LaLaurie party, a fire broke out in the kitchen, which was separated from the actual house. The firemen broke into the kitchen and found two slaves chained to the stove. It was believed that the slaves started the fire themselves in order to draw attention and hope to secure their freedom, at least from being chained to the stove. After this incident, the LaLauries fled their home in New Orleans and disappeared from society altogether. Some say they escaped to Paris, while others say they lived on the outskirts of the city.

Over the years since the LaLauries fled New Orleans, the story got bigger and bigger. No one knows for sure exactly how far the horror went in that house but a local newspaper wrote an article that basically refused to go into detail about the horror found there because it was too graphic. Rumors persisted such as lurid allegations regarding buckets of genitalia, makeshift sex-change operations, brains stirred with sticks, women nailed to floors by their intestines, tongues sewn together, mouths stuffed with excrement and stitched up, females flayed to resemble caterpillars, suits of human skin, sliced penises, “human crabs”, bottles of blood or “grand gore chambers”; but they do not detail scores of victims, nor evidence for which can be traced in accounts published at the time.

After the LaLaurie’s fled New Orleans, neighbors claimed to hear screams and groans of agony coming from the abandoned house, as well as seeing the apparitions of slaves in the yard and balcony. In 1837, the mansion was purchased by a man who only lived there for three months. He claimed that he could not sleep there because he was plagued by the strange noises of groans, screams and so on of people who were not there. He attempted to rent out rooms to people but they never stayed very long either — most could only take it for a few days before they left. The owner of the mansion was finally forced to abandon the property because the ghosts of slaves were chasing away everyone who tried to live there.

The mansion was left to disrepair for thirty years until after the Civil War when it was turned into a public high school. In 1874, the White League forced the black children to leave the school but a short time later, the school was changed to be an all black school. An English teacher turned the school into a music conservatory and dancing school in 1882 and attracted girls from the finest families. More bad luck plagued the building, however, when accusations came against the teacher for having improprieties with girls in the school and it closed the next day. A few years later, even more strangeness plagued the mansion when Jules Vignie moved in and died in the house among filth and squalor. There was a bag containing a few hundred dollars near his body and a thousand dollars stuffed in a mattress. Rumors of hidden treasure in the house persisted but nobody wanted to risk going into the notorious mansion to find it and the building sat abandoned for years.

With the waves of immigrants coming to America at the turn of the twentieth century, landlords everywhere began buying up old abandoned buildings for cheap and turning them into apartments for the population boom. The LaLaurie house was turned into an apartment building but the tenant turnover rate was relatively high considering the cheap rent. Stories persisted of screams, groans and other noises where there should be no reason to hear such things. One man was accosted in a stairwell by the ghost of a naked, shackled slave man who allegedly tried to physically attack him. Children reported being chased by a ghost brandishing a whip and a mother was horrified to find the ghost of a woman dressed in finery leaning over her baby in a crib. Many people also reported seeing strange figures wrapped in shrouds. The building was abandoned for years once again.

Since then, the mansion has been a furniture store and a bar. The owner of the furniture store was frustrated for a long time because he thought vandals were damaging his furniture every night and leaving a strange dark liquid on the merchandise. He decided to wait all night with a shotgun. The furniture was once again damaged but there was no sign that anybody had come in or left the building. Frightened and frustrated, the building was once again abandoned.

In recent years, the mansion was renovated and turned into luxury apartments. When someone pulled up floorboards in part of the house, they found skeletons. Authorities investigated and found the remains to be multiple human bodies. It is believed that the skeletal remains were the bodies of slaves that people in Madame LaLaurie’s time had noticed disappeared and never returned. It is unknown how many slaves were killed, tortured, whipped or neglected under Madame LaLaurie’s care but the discovery of the skeletons under the floors speak clearly that she was trying to hide her deeds from her neighbors and the authorities. The discovery of the skeletons lends credence to the stories of slave ghosts that have persisted for almost two hundred years, as well as adding credibility to the horrific things her neighbors suspected of her.

Nicholas Cage bought the LaLaurie mansion in 2007. It went into foreclosure and it was purchased by a financial group on November 13, 2009 for $2.3 million. Is is possible that the horrible energy in the mansion will always prevent it from finding a permanent owner? Time will only tell. New Orleans is probably the most haunted city in the country and its residents are mostly used to the paranormal activity. There is something distinctly different about the LaLaurie mansion that makes it on the extreme end of the horrific, the gruesome and the tortured.

Read More

>Dressgasm of the Day: Late 1860s Silk Brocade

Posted by Jessica Jewett 1 Comment »

>

Today’s dressgasm of the day is a rare specimen from the later part of the 1860s. It’s listed on eBay right now for a pretty penny and the seller estimates the year to be 1867. What makes it rare is the fact that the matching bonnet survived, in tact, with the dress after decades and decades. The dress is made of striped silk brocade in a cocoa color and it is two pieces — a bodice and a skirt — rather than a one piece dress. There were dresses for almost every daily activity in the upper class and this dress appears to me to be a visiting or walking dress. The sleeves appear to be modified coat sleeves, which were narrow and closed at the cuff as opposed to the wide bell-shaped pagoda sleeves of the 1850s.

The best way to date a dress in the 1860s is by looking at the shoulder seams. Early in the decade, the shoulder seams fell a few inches below the natural shoulder to give the illusion of width so the waist would look smaller. As the decade progressed, the shoulder seams crept higher and higher until they were straight up and down by the end of the decade.

The bonnet is a good example of a half bonnet from the late 1860s that preceded the bonnets of the 1870s. As the nineteenth century progressed, bonnets went from wide-brimmed, head-swallowing contraptions to small decorations resting on top of the head. This example of late 1860s design is a woven straw bonnet over a wired frame with a tulle lining, fruit-like cloth accents, flowers and bows. There is also a pre-made bow to the chin ties. Straw bonnets with false flowers and decorations were probably the most common type of bonnet used by all classes. Wealthier women expressed themselves through more intricate decoration and better materials.

Read More

>Previously unknown photograph of Joshua L. Chamberlain? Part II

Posted by Jessica Jewett 3 Comments »

>

Yesterday I made my case for proving that this handsome bearded fellow on the left is actually a previously unknown photograph of Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain. Before you read this blog, you need to go read yesterday’s blog by clicking here.

Go on. I’ll wait.

Insert elevator music here.

Done? Pretty convincing, right? It wasn’t quite enough for me even with all the facial matching and possible documentation that I was able to show all of you. After I posted yesterday’s blog, a few people told me that the police use ears to identify people sometimes because our ears are almost as unique as fingerprints. So I went digging again to find pictures of Lawrence in which his ear wasn’t too covered up by his hair and at the same angle as this mystery fellow. I found this picture for comparison:

He certainly liked having his picture made at that profile angle or maybe the photographers thought he looked best from that angle. I’m not sure. The fact that there are so many profile or three-quarter profile photographs from that specific angle should possibly even be taken into consideration as proof that this bearded man is probably Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain. So my next step was to cut out the ears from the bearded man and the known photograph of Lawrence. Here is how they looked side by side:

Strikingly similar, in my opinion. The ear on the right appears to come to a point but in other pictures of Lawrence, that point is actually rounded like the bearded man’s ear on the left. I decided to try and do the overlap comparison like I did yesterday to see how similar or how different the ears were. These were the results of my overlap comparison:

 
 

Despite the comparison photograph of Lawrence making the bottom of his earlobe look pointed, the size and features of both of the earlobes are the same. The trouble with trying to identify a person through nineteenth century photographs is that the photographs are going to be blurry and out of focus sometimes. Tricks of the light can actually make the same person look totally different in various photographs. Here are two photographs below that show Lawrence’s earlobe as being rounded at the bottom, to dispel any possible doubts.

In my opinion, the ears are too close to matching to say it’s just a coincidence, especially when you add everything else from yesterday’s blog to the case. Of course, I will never be able to say for certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that the bearded man is Lawrence without a historical smoking gun like a letter or something that specifically says, “I had my picture made today and my beard looked especially bushy,” or something to that effect. Regardless, the bearded man fought in the Civil War. I will give him a good home among my other Civil War artifacts whether he is historically proven to be Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain or not. That’s just what I do.

What do YOU think? Is there enough evidence to say the bearded man is Lawrence?

Read More