Archive for November, 2009

>Dressgasm of the Day: 1774 Wedding Dress

Posted by Jessica Jewett 4 Comments »

>

This could quite possibly be the most epic dressgasm I’ll ever post. This sculpture of a gown, more of a work of art rather than a dress, was the wedding dress of Edwige Elisabeth Charlotte de Holstein-Gottorp. She was French, as I recall (please correct me), and this wedding gown was made for her to marry Prince Karl of Sweden in 1774. Upon her marriage, she became the sister-in-law of King Gustave III of Sweden. This was happening at the same time of Marie Antoinette’s rise to power in France and she later gave a painting of herself and her children to King Gustave. Additionally, it has been hotly debated as to whether Marie Antoinette had an affair with a Swede who was a confidante of his own king, as I recall. These royal families were all intertwined and related to one another throughout Europe.

Gowns of the European court were massive in the eighteenth century and not at all representative of what the regular population wore. Fabrics of the super-rich were threaded with real silver and gold, accented with intricate laces, embroidery and many gowns had actual jewels sewn into them. It was a very romantic and naive period of history in which women were beautiful pieces of adornment like a fabulous piece of furniture or a delicious ostentatious cake. As economy, philosophy, education and social debates arose in Europe and the Colonies, the romance faded somewhat and the size and scope of these gowns faded with it.

And here is a painting of Edwige Elisabeth Charlotte de Holstein-Gottorp wearing the above wedding dress.

Read More

>Sequels are harder than new novels!

Posted by Jessica Jewett 2 Comments »

>

I seem to have temporarily lost my muse. It’s never permanent. It just seems to happen when I’m preoccupied with working on client readings and when I’m stressed out about everyday mundane things. As a writer, the hardest thing is to keep the momentum going from the first word you type on the manuscript until the last. Writing a novel or a nonfiction book is anything but easy. You have to have a lot of self-discipline just to make yourself sit down and do the work everyday because it’s not going to write itself. Then, of course, you have to worry about plot structure, character development, pacing, grammar and mechanics, editing, more editing and yet still more editing. The average novel takes about two years to complete from conception to completion and that’s if you work at it every day. With my first novel, From the Darkness Risen, I was still in high school when I started it and it took six years, I think, to complete. It was a lot of trial and error to find my voice and I don’t even think I got my footing until halfway through.

Now I’m older and I’ve got a lot of writing experience under my belt. I don’t think Isabelle, Eva, Robert and Thaddeus are done telling their story yet either. I have been tinkering with the ideas for a sequel for about a year now, tentatively titled Fire on the Mississippi, but I didn’t sit down to really put serious pen to paper until recently. Being imprisoned in the motel during the flood made me want to write out some of my ideas but sharing a room with my grandmother all day every day wasn’t that easy. I got started not long after we got back home but, of course, I’ve lost my muse. I think I’m going to have to reread my own novel to remember all the nuances I put into the characters. One thing I always hate with sequels is when they sound like totally different books because it’s clear the author stepped too far away from the first book.

I’m also a very visual person. Maybe I should be a screenwriter instead of a novelist! I like to scout locations and look for pictures of people, places and things that speak to me as part of the story. I translate images into words fairly well. So I have been pulling together some images that I’m using to help me get my creative mojo going again.

The above picture is a lithograph of St. Louis done in 1854, which is about nine years before the setting of the sequel, and you can see the Mississippi River in the background. Eva finds herself still living in St. Louis with Thaddeus in Fire on the Mississippi despite her best laid plans to be a pampered housewife back home in Charleston as she was bred to be. She is struggling to cope with life as a “cripple” and feeling restless, wondering if she might have rushed into marriage no matter how much she loves Thaddeus. It’s her restlessness that gets her mixed up in espionage again and she falls in with the boat burners, which were not unlike modern terrorist organizations. Her life spirals into chaos and in classic Eva fashion, she believes she’s doing the right thing but is really hurting other people.

The above picture is a lithograph of Charleston, South Carolina, during the Civil War with Charleston Harbor in the background, I think. In Fire on the Mississippi, Isabelle’s story takes a backseat to Eva’s but it is nonetheless interesting. The beginning of the sequel finds Isabelle, Robert, Cole and Willie living with her mother on the Battery. Isabelle’s struggling with a difficult pregnancy and Robert’s headed back to active duty. I think the direction I’m going to go with this sequel is pushing the boundaries and testing how far the war can strain marriages. I see in the news a lot about how these modern wars are straining military marriages and I want to get into the nitty gritty of how it was to be a wife in a city nearly occupied by the enemy on a daily basis.

I also wanted to give faces to my characters. I went through the wartime images on my computer until I found some people that looked like the characters I made up in my head. I haven’t found a Robert or a Thaddeus yet because I tend to have very specific, unique looks for my male characters for some reason, but here are the three faces to Eva, Isabelle and Willie, in that order. Are these how the characters looked in your mind when you read From the Darkness Risen? I’m curious.

 
 
Read More

>Dressgasm of the Day: 1860s Maternity Dress

Posted by Jessica Jewett 2 Comments »

>

Today’s dressgasm is not exceptional in its beauty or design but it is extremely unique in that it’s both a maternity dress and it’s such a dark color. I don’t know a lot about the background of this dress since I think it was a picture lifted from an old eBay listing (I could be mistaken though).

The dress is either black, faded and stained in some places, or it’s a charcoal or navy color. Sometimes it’s difficult to tell when the aging of the fabric can sometimes alter the color’s original depth and intensity. The sleeves appear to be modified coat sleeves with black trim and the same black trim can be found along the front of the dress and around the lower foot of the skirt. I can’t quite tell what type of fabric that makes this dress but my best estimate is it might be silk taffeta or a silk wool blend or a silk cotton blend. If it’s not some type of silk, I would be surprised, because heavier fabrics don’t typically wrinkle or crinkle like that from what I have seen in the past.

It’s not so common to find in tact maternity dresses from the nineteenth century because most women didn’t have the money or the resources to have new dresses made for when they were pregnant. In most cases, women altered existing dresses for the pregnancy and then altered the dresses again when they lost the baby weight. Women spent a great deal of their married lives either pregnant or nursing so they also spent a lot of time in confinement. It was inappropriate for a woman to be out in public if she could possibly help it once the pregnancy was too far advanced to hide the baby bump. A lot of women just wore their house dresses, which were loose-fitting dresses usually in paisley or calico for most people and better material for the rich. For that reason, most house dresses can be advertised as possible maternity dresses as well but because they were so loose, it’s very difficult to tell if they were actually used during pregnancy or not.

This particular maternity dress is odd to me because it’s so dark and it looks more like a DRESS than a house dress. I think this lady must have had some money or she never re-altered the dress after the pregnancy was over. The lace trim and stripe trim cost money for just a house dress or a temporary garment to be worn around the house in confinement. Was this lady vain? Was she rich? Or could she possibly have died before she had a chance to take the dress in after birth? Childbirth was the leading cause of fatality among women and the child mortality rate was sky high. One thing is clear: this maternity dress speaks of mystery to me and that’s why I chose it.

Read More